Personal Property
Back to Reality
As vacation-home markets cool, would-be buyers should take
a sober look at the economics of ownership
By JUNE FLETCHER
March 27, 2006; Page R4
The vacation-home market
certainly has changed since I dove into it not that long ago.
On Aug. 30, 2004, the very day I
took my only son to his first day at college, I went trolling
through home listings on the Internet, and wound up making an
offer on a second home in Naples, Fla. Freud probably would have
had a field day with that, but I wasn't just trying to distract
myself from the pangs of an empty nest. If I was going to get
the vacation home I had been dreaming of, there was no time to
waste.
THE JOURNAL REPORT
At the time, real-estate prices
were rocketing and supply was scarce, especially in resort towns
like Naples, which sits on the Gulf of Mexico in southwest
Florida. As was true in other coastal towns, relatively modest
places like the one I bought, a three-bedroom condo near the
beach, were being snapped up within days or even hours of being
put on the market, sight unseen.
It didn't even matter that
hurricanes were blasting through the gulf almost weekly. Buyer
mania was so strong that I drove from the airport to my first
walk-through inspection of the home in the furious rain and
whipping winds of Hurricane Jeanne; at one point, I raced my
rental car past a palm tree leaning over the road at an alarming
angle and watched in my rear-view mirror as it crashed to the
ground. I felt pressure to close the sale quickly, since
would-be buyers started putting backup offers on the home almost
from the moment my full-price offer of $225,000 was accepted. I
didn't want the sellers to look for reasons to back out of the
deal.
The home grew in value at
supersonic speed even while the sale was in escrow. Judging from
sales of comparable units, in the five months between my
purchase offer and my first mortgage payment, my beach place
appreciated by more than $150,000, a gain of more than 66%. It
had taken more than five years for my primary home in the
Washington, D.C., suburbs to grow two-thirds in value. At the
end of 2005, the median price of a single-family home in Naples
reached $367,100, a 36% gain over the year before, almost three
times the national appreciation rate. I felt like I'd won a
palm-fringed lottery.
TOO HOT?
Among the nation's most overvalued markets for
single-family homes are these metro areas with a high
concentration of vacation homes, where prices are pushed
up by out-of-town buyers |
TOWN |
MEDIAN PRICE
|
OVER-VALUATION
|
Naples, Fla.
|
$367,100 |
96.3% |
Santa Barbara,
Calif. |
638,000 |
76.7 |
Bend, Ore.
|
256,200 |
68.4 |
West Palm
Beach, Fla. |
274,300 |
59.0 |
Ocean City,
N.J. |
304,500 |
49.5 |
Barnstable,
Mass. |
352,800 |
45.8 |
St. George,
Utah |
225,400 |
42.9 |
Phoenix
|
233,500 |
41.9 |
Las Vegas
|
273,200 |
39.0 |
Honolulu
|
554,600 |
35.3 |
Note: Median
prices are as of fourth quarter 2005. Overvaluations are
based on historical norms for home prices, household
income, population density and other factors.
Source: Global Insights/National City Corp. survey
of 299 metro markets |
But there are clear signs that
the tide is turning in Naples. Inventory levels now are four
times as high as they were a year ago, local real-estate agents
say, largely because nervous investors are trying to cash out
their gains before rising mortgage interest rates topple the
market. "Big price reduction" ads are starting to pop up in the
thick weekly real-estate sections of the Naples Daily News.
Worse, at the end of 2005 Naples was 96.3% overvalued -- based
on historical norms for home prices, household income,
population density and other factors -- according to a quarterly
analysis of 299 housing markets by Boston-based research company
Global Insight Inc. and Cleveland financial holding company
National City Corp. That made it the most overvalued housing
market in the country.
Hand me my crying towel, please.
Of course, Naples isn't the only
second-home mecca that the report calls overvalued. Others
include Santa Barbara, Calif. (76.7%), Bend, Ore. (68.4%), and
Miami (60.8%). Indeed, coastal areas popular with vacationers
and investors are by far the most likely to have had
unsustainable price increases, says National City's chief
economist, Richard de Kaser, who conducted the study. He notes
that 18 of the 20 most overvalued markets in the country are in
California and Florida; the most undervalued markets are in the
center of the country, including Texas, Minnesota and Michigan.
As recently as the end of 2003,
Mr. de Kaser says, only seven towns were considered extremely
overvalued -- 30% or more out of line. Now 71 are, representing
42% of all of the housing value in the country. That shouldn't
matter to people who are buying in an overvalued spot for the
long term, he says, but it should matter if you plan to sell
within a few years. "It's absolutely not the time to take
risks," he says.
So, vacation-home buyers, take
heed: The days when you could flip a beach house or ski place
for fun and profit are probably over. That doesn't mean that you
should avoid a second home altogether, but it's time to take a
serious look at the economic factors that propel vacation
markets, and to weigh the financial costs of ownership. Here are
some things to consider:
WHO'S BUYING -- AND WHO CAN'T?
It seems every real-estate agent
says that now -- whenever that happens to be -- is the best time
to buy, but obviously, that's not always the case. So before you
invest in any resort town, check on the dynamics of the local
real-estate market and on the area's economic health.
First, look at who's buying. Are
new households coming into the area, and why or why not? Are
homes selling mostly to investors, part-time owners or permanent
residents? Too many investors can leave a market vulnerable to
substantial price swings. A preponderance of part-timers can
drive up prices and drive out locals. Permanent residents lend
the market stability. Real-estate agents and local lenders are
good sources for this kind of information.
Second-home buyers should look
into school quality and the general affordability of homes in
the area, even if these issues don't affect them directly, says
Ken Libby, a real-estate broker in Stowe, Vt. "They affect the
long-term prognosis of the community," he says.
If the schools are terrible or
declining, permanent residents may be inclined to move away,
leading to vacation-home ghost towns and depressed real-estate
values. You can get information on school performance from
real-estate agents or from the Web site of the state education
department.
Buyers also need to ask about
job growth in the area they're considering. If year-round
residents can't find work, they won't be able to buy homes. But
even if job growth is strong, affordability is important. While
part-time residents may not give much thought to where the local
teachers, firefighters, police officers and restaurant workers
live, they should, many real-estate agents say, because when
these workers get priced out of the market, essential services
suffer -- and so do home prices. And there's a warning signal
here: According to the National Association of Realtors, in the
fourth quarter of 2005, housing affordability hit its lowest
level since 1991.
HOW EASY IS IT TO SELL?
Housing markets take a long time
to change from boom to bust, because homeowners often are loath
to accept that things have changed. A home can linger for months
on the market before a seller finally realizes that he isn't
going to get the same price that his neighbor did during last
summer's price peak.
But some statistics are early
warning signs that a market is in decline, and you can find
these in local newspapers, online or by talking to real-estate
agents or local government officials. If inventory levels or
foreclosure rates start to rise, or the average number of days
that homes in the area sit on the market starts to creep up, the
market may be turning.
Also, look at what big home
builders are doing, especially if the number of permits being
issued starts to decline, since they keep a close eye on markets
and pull out at the first sign that they're becoming overbuilt.
Once builders start giving away freebies like finished
basements, watch out -- if they feel the need to give
incentives, it could well be because the market is softening.
Housing starts and new-home
closed sales and presales are also worth tracking, but bear in
mind that these can remain high even in markets that are in the
early stages of decline, since before builders can cut back,
they must first finish constructing and selling the homes they
already have in the pipeline.
DOES RENTING MAKE MORE SENSE
THAN BUYING?
Thanks to a number of Web-based
calculators, it's now relatively easy to compare the cost of
renting versus owning. For instance, using the online "rent
versus buy" calculator at TCalc.com, I computed the cost of a
home for five years at a purchase price of $425,000 versus
renting it at $1,500 a month, with a 1% increase in rent each
year. I assumed a 5% down payment of $21,250, a 30-year
fixed-rate loan at 6.9% with one point, $4,250 in closing fees,
$583 annually in homeowner's insurance, $390 a month in condo
association fees, a 1.25% property-tax rate, a 6% annual
home-price appreciation rate, and a 28% tax bracket. Under this
scenario, buying wins -- largely because of equity buildup and
mortgage interest deductions. Over the five-year span, the
calculator shows, you'd spend $83,218 to rent the home, compared
with $53,759 to buy it -- a saving of $29,459.
But online calculators are
imperfect when it comes to vacation homes. First, renters rarely
rent vacation homes for an entire year -- they rent seasonally.
Seasonal rents are often double what annual renters pay, but
they only obligate the renter for a short period of time. So a
renter who paid $3,000 a month would be out $9,000 for a
three-month season, compared with $12,222 for the owner.
An owner has other costs the
renter avoids. Equipping a three-bedroom home with all of the
stylish furnishings and electronics upscale buyers demand can
cost upwards of $20,000. And when it comes time to sell, unless
you want to take on the responsibility of marketing your own
home, you'll have to pay a real-estate commission. At 6%, that
would come to $25,500 for the purchase price assumed above. So
the gains you make from owning rather than renting can easily be
wiped out.
You can recoup some of your
costs by renting out the home when you're not around, but
according to the National Association of Realtors, eight out of
10 vacation-home buyers choose not to do that. Perhaps that's
because renting out a home entails a host of other expenses that
can run into the thousands of dollars, including repairs,
cleaning, advertising and professional property management -- an
expense that by itself can eat up as much as 30% of the rental
income.
Ultimately, the decision to buy
a vacation home rather than renting it will probably come down
to more than economics -- just as it did with me in my mad-dash
pursuit of a Naples beach house. But whether you're looking for
a weekend getaway, an eventual retirement home, or a gathering
spot to pass on to the grandchildren, don't let the sunlight
dazzle you. In this cooling housing market, you are probably
going to be spending your vacations there for a long, long time.
--Ms. Fletcher is a Wall Street Journal staff
reporter in Vienna, Va.
Write to June Fletcher at june.fletcher@wsj.com
|